Close

Articles Posted in Slip and Fall Injury

Updated:

According to Tennessee Court, City Governments Mostly Immune From Liability for Prison Work Details

Tennessee’s Governmental Tort Liability Act governs how and when government agencies can be held liable for torts that may occur on their property or that have been committed by their employees. Under the GTLA, government agencies are generally immune from suit when injuries result from the government doing its job,…

Updated:

Tennessee Court Grants Summary Judgment When No Risk Could Have Been Anticipated

Premises liability and negligence claims arise when property owners have knowledge of circumstance or conditions on their property that could potentially cause harm, but they do not do anything to address those risks. While knowledge or awareness of a risk can be broadly interpreted, courts have consistently held that property…

Updated:

Tennessee Court Denies Premises Liability Claims of Pro Se Plaintiff

Bringing claims in a Tennessee courtroom can be expensive. Getting a case ready for trial takes extensive preparation, discovery, and long days and nights thinking through the details of the case. This means that fees can add up, and lawyers may seem too expensive to consider. In these circumstances, some plaintiffs…

Updated:

Tennessee Court Emphasizes That Dangerous Conditions Must Actually Cause Harm

One of the most overlooked aspects of any negligence claim is the requirement that a plaintiff show that the danger or harm she experienced actually caused the injuries that were incurred. Often, when an accident or injury occurs, and a dangerous condition existed, we simply assume that the two are…

Updated:

Landlord Liability Even for Open and Obvious Dangerous Conditions in Tennessee

When dealing with premises liability and other personal injury cases, it is well accepted that landlords and owners have a duty to warn those entering or using their property of known dangerous conditions. If a plaintiff does not know that a condition exists, it is impossible for them to avoid…

Updated:

Tennessee Court Employs Rule of Seven to Evaluate Comparative Negligence Claim Against a Minor

Tennessee is a comparative negligence state. This means that when a plaintiff’s negligence is greater than a defendant’s negligence, the plaintiff cannot recover compensation from the defendant, even if the defendant was partially negligent in causing an accident or injury.  Comparative negligence assumes full capacity, however, and special rules must be…

Updated:

Who Is Liable for Injuries Resulting From Open and Obvious Conditions? – Goodwin v. Al J Schneider Co.

Landowners and individuals who invite another person into their home owe their invitees a duty to protect them from unreasonably dangerous conditions.  But what happens when an invitee is also aware of the dangerous condition and knowingly attempts to navigate it, but ultimately hurts him or herself? Is the landowner…

Updated:

Determining Damages in Tennessee When the Jury’s Verdict Exceeds the Amount Requested

It is a well-established principle of the law that damages are, in most instances, for the jury to decide. When a plaintiff and a defendant have a jury trial, and a jury finds the defendant liable, the jury will then address the amount of damages that the plaintiff should receive. Typically, a jury’s…

Updated:

Tennessee Court Finds Lack of Knowledge of Dangerous Condition Sufficient for Summary Judgment

Many negligence cases arise out of a failure of one party to properly protect others.  A party may choose to cut corners, thereby creating a dangerous product, or may knowingly fail to correct an existing problem in order to save money.  In these circumstances, when another person is injured as a…